Re:Richmond’s rules: Why one California town is keeping Wall...
by makomk on Sunday October 06, 2013 @07:41AM
(#6503782)
I don't think it's going to be that bad. Remember that eminent domain requires the government to pay the fair market value of the property being seized - and conveniently, it's difficult for the banks to disagree with that fair market value, because it's the amount they'd value the houses at when they inevitably foreclosed on them.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.