News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mozilla bug 923590: Pledge never to implement HTML5 DRM by shadowmint on Friday October 04, 2013 @09:03PM (#6498975)
It's irrelevant whether the CDM is part of the browser, part of the OS or an installed plugin like Java.

The browser must invoke the closed source, vendor provided CDM by pass a binary stream from the server.

Certainly, it's no worse than what we currently have, but current plugins have, shall we say, a rocky security history wouldn't you say? (>_> java)

Worse, every content provider is going to have their home written CDM, because they certainly aren't going to share. Once a CDM is compromised thats it, it's useless.

It's going to be a nightmare of install-all-the-plugins. Most likely major browsers will bundle the most popular one to reduce the burden on the user.

Re:Mozilla bug 923590: Pledge never to implement HTML5 DRM by acdha on Sunday October 06, 2013 @01:14PM (#6504647)
Look at the security track record of all plugins. Notice how few of the vulnerabilities are in the actual content decryption code as opposed to the code duplicating things the browser does natively? Also consider how sandboxes the CDM interface can be if it's just passing data through to decode.

That's why this is such a big improvement.