Re:GCHQ report on 'Mullenize' program to 'stain' anonymous e...
by fleitz on Friday October 04, 2013 @06:25PM
(#6498424)
It's most likely just an error in terminology. They likely mean request instead of packet as the user-agent isn't in every packet.
If it was packet level it would likely be in the IP headers, I don't imagine it would be that difficult to rewrite the packets with optional fields and then put a token in the optional headers.
If it was packet level it would likely be in the IP headers, I don't imagine it would be that difficult to rewrite the packets with optional fields and then put a token in the optional headers.