Re:Tesla stock tumbles after Model S catches fire
by saraid216 on Thursday October 03, 2013 @03:55PM
(#6491552)
If your answer to the question was "no", you should say "no" and then clarify. It's not that hard.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Tesla stock tumbles after Model S catches fire
by Tloewald on Thursday October 03, 2013 @07:27PM
(#6492833)
I neither like misrepresenting other people's positions nor am I prone to doing it despite not liking it.
Have I misrepresented your positions?
If your answer was "no" then why not say that?
Re:Tesla stock tumbles after Model S catches fire
by saraid216 on Thursday October 03, 2013 @07:57PM
(#6492947)
...not sure if you've mistaken me for someone else. I have no part in this discussion except making the procedural point.
Re:Tesla stock tumbles after Model S catches fire
by Tloewald on Thursday October 03, 2013 @09:47PM
(#6493281)
Whoops. Sorry about that.
My point (addressed incorrectly) stands. It makes less sense for me to answer "no" than for the person I was responding to to answer "no". If I was making a "straw man" then in what way was it straw? If I was misrepresenting his/her opinions, how so? Otherwise, if more-or-less accurately summarizing a person's positions is ad hominem then what does that say of those positions?