Patent Troll Lodsys Settles for Nothing to Avoid Trial

Re:Patent Troll Lodsys Settles for Nothing to Avoid Trial by Daniel_Newby on Thursday October 03, 2013 @04:23AM (#6487748)

What would actually happen is that high-dollar lawyers would not take low-dollar cases. Small fraud would be effectively legalized.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Patent Troll Lodsys Settles for Nothing to Avoid Trial by seabee on Thursday October 03, 2013 @05:53AM (#6487947)

Except that low-dollar cases are dealt with through a small claims court: http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/england/law_e/law_legal_system...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Patent Troll Lodsys Settles for Nothing to Avoid Trial by Daniel_Newby on Thursday October 03, 2013 @07:28AM (#6488190)

Perhaps. Fraud tends to require an extensive discovery process to establish the facts, but small claims court is optimized for cases where the facts are agreed upon but the application of law is in dispute.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Patent Troll Lodsys Settles for Nothing to Avoid Trial by kamjam on Thursday October 03, 2013 @10:09AM (#6488975)

There's also the police, whose job it is to investigate crime...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Patent Troll Lodsys Settles for Nothing to Avoid Trial by darkarmani on Thursday October 03, 2013 @12:02PM (#6489869)

Good. Small fraud doesn't really matter when you are talking about patents, because they are so expensive to get and litigate. Patents that aren't valuable shouldn't block innovation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Patent Troll Lodsys Settles for Nothing to Avoid Trial by webjprgm on Thursday October 03, 2013 @01:21PM (#6490418)

Could we have loser-pays-cost only for patent lawsuits?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Patent Troll Lodsys Settles for Nothing to Avoid Trial by njharman on Thursday October 03, 2013 @12:29PM (#6490038)

Also, instead of Patent trolls there would be (even more) lawsuit trolls.

Every mechanism has a means to game it.

[ Parent | on HN ]