News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Lmctfy: Google's Linux application container stack. Parent comment

Re:Lmctfy: Google's Linux application container stack by shykes on Thursday October 03, 2013 @03:22AM (#6487586)
Damn. This means it's much less useful to me (and 99% of applications outside of google). I guess I could combine lmctfy with a namespacing library of my own. But that's more extra work than I was anticipating.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Lmctfy: Google's Linux application container stack by thockin on Thursday October 03, 2013 @03:30AM (#6487609)
Namespaces will be coming, but we're not there yet. This captures some of what we are already doing internally, but not all of it, yet.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Lmctfy: Google's Linux application container stack by SEJeff on Thursday October 03, 2013 @08:52PM (#6493120)
Perhaps they'd be open to a collaboration where you add that functionality and then you use it to make docker (even more!) awesome.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Lmctfy: Google's Linux application container stack by justincormack on Thursday October 03, 2013 @04:46PM (#6491910)
The namespacing part is much simpler, if you have specific use cases.
[ Parent | on HN ]