Re:Are you smart enough to work at a start-up?
by jnord on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @10:07PM
(#6486691)
Looks like that number is in base-36 instead of base-10 (decimal). Using http://www.unitconversion.org/numbers/base-10-to-base-36-con... yields number 80113871 as the last 8 digits of the phone number.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Are you smart enough to work at a start-up?
by vjeux on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @10:37PM
(#6486771)
You can also type the following in your JS console :)
parseInt('1bp49b', 36)
"The only problem is it's so tough, no one has managed to crack it yet." is very silly
Re:Are you smart enough to work at a start-up?
by yeah_ok on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @10:46PM
(#6486804)
I agree, "The only problem is it's so tough, no one has managed to crack it yet" is a very silly comment. Anyone who's done high school computing can probably figure this one out :(
Re:Are you smart enough to work at a start-up?
by jdoconnor on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @11:12PM
(#6486922)
in ruby '1bp49b'.to_i(36)
Re:Are you smart enough to work at a start-up?
by Patrick_Devine on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @11:28PM
(#6486970)
I'd be remiss without mentioning it in python: int('1bp49b', 36)
Re:Are you smart enough to work at a start-up?
by damncabbage on Thursday October 03, 2013 @01:23AM
(#6487345)
In poster form: http://www.flickr.com/photos/craftydogma/6657220791/
Re:Are you smart enough to work at a start-up?
by aaronpk on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @10:12PM
(#6486706)
Looks like you are smart enough to work at a startup!
Re:Are you smart enough to work at a start-up?
by gooderlooking on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @10:48PM
(#6486809)
You too can be like Zuckerberg, by becoming employee #336 at a company rebranded in 2009 as a startup!