Re:Children aren't born smart. They're made smart by convers...
by malandrew on Tuesday October 01, 2013 @11:55PM
(#6480509)
FWIW language gives children a tool with which they can discuss and more importantly reason about abstract concepts. The sooner you acquire a rich and varied vocabulary the sooner you can form a rich understanding about the phenomena in the world around you. Since kids learn fastest when they are young and that slows with age, a strong grasp of language means that they can absorb and understand more abstractions sooner. Measures of betweenness, distance, centrality and distance for nodes in a child's mental graph of abstractions are all likely to be better when you have a richer vocabulary at a young age. Even edges between abstractions can be linguistic abstractions like similes and metaphors, giving a child a quickness in recall of well understood abstractions to aid in the processing and understanding of novel concepts.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Children aren't born smart. They're made smart by convers...
by eulerphi on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @12:36AM
(#6480630)
Edges between abstractions? You lost me with your abstraction.
Re:Children aren't born smart. They're made smart by convers...
by im3w1l on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @08:10AM
(#6481925)
Graph edges
Re:Children aren't born smart. They're made smart by convers...
by malandrew on Wednesday October 02, 2013 @05:16PM
(#6485456)
This. betweenness, centrality, distance, nodes and edges are all graph theory terms. I wrote that in Safari on an iPhone so it wasn't easy to proofread. A few typos and one repeated word in there.