News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Freelan - an open-source, multi-platform, peer-to-peer VP... by kika on Sunday September 29, 2013 @08:26PM (#6467156)
I wrote specifically "BSD-type" not BSD. We didn't use BSD license itself, as far as I can tell and the project contains surprisingly small amount of _any_ third party code.

I do not consider "poisonous license" a derogatory term. English is not my native language, may be this is why.

Re:Freelan - an open-source, multi-platform, peer-to-peer VP... by belorn on Sunday September 29, 2013 @08:40PM (#6467202)
That's fair. I consider calling anything, be that GPL, BSD, or open source as poisonous as to be on the side of derogatory term, similar to the cancer comparison made by Steve Ballmer. I can see however if that’s not always the case for others.

Just as a side note, I found an half year old HN article which talked about the BSD requirements, with suggest that one might want to use ISC license in some cases: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5798431

Not that your project is code for embedded software (or is it? C code tend to be quite fast and have small memory footprint), but it might be an interesting read.

Re:Freelan - an open-source, multi-platform, peer-to-peer VP... by kika on Sunday September 29, 2013 @10:49PM (#6467521)
We designed and coded it with embedded in mind. We both have extensive embedded experience and it was a no brainer with all that hype about "internet of things". Our stack is naturally born IPv6 and as such is a natural match for "things", so not thinking about embedding would have been clearly a mistake.