News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Myth of the Rockstar Programmer. Parent comment

Re:The Myth of the Rockstar Programmer by tanzam75 on Sunday September 29, 2013 @01:37PM (#6465857)
> As a sidenote, I find this obnoxious: > "I hate Quora, so I'll just steal their content and post it here."

It's not Quora's content. Quora's TOS explicitly states that users retain ownership over their contributions. Quora only gets a non-exclusive license.

Scott Hanselman works for Microsoft. Nade Waddoups works for Microsoft, wrote an internal document at Microsoft, and then posted part of it to Quora as an answer.

Therefore: The copyright is held not by Quora, or even by Nate Waddoups -- but by Microsoft. And since Scott Hanselman is performing a PR function at Microsoft through his blogging, he has the right to post that content on his blog.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Myth of the Rockstar Programmer by shanselman on Sunday September 29, 2013 @06:02PM (#6466717)
That's a little complex of an explanation. I could still argue fair use. Regardless, it's a coincidence that this guy works for MSFT. I don't know him. I just stumbled on the Quora post.

The link from my post also explains why Quora is evil, I'm detail, FWIW.

[ Parent | on HN ]