News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Rent Affordability Gap in San Francisco. Parent comment

Re:Rent Affordability Gap in San Francisco by rayiner on Sunday September 29, 2013 @11:26AM (#6465409)
Read her other posts. It's basically the same litany of views (supporting highly paid municipal workers and rent controls while opposing aggressive policing) that have pushed people out into the suburbs, simultaneously destroying American cities while putting their finances in shambles.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rent Affordability Gap in San Francisco by pessimizer on Sunday September 29, 2013 @11:37AM (#6465431)
People ran to the suburbs because of rent controls and highly paid municipal workers? In what narrative?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rent Affordability Gap in San Francisco by spikels on Sunday September 29, 2013 @12:02PM (#6465493)
Both of these policies drive up the cost of living causing families to move out[1]:

Rent control makes apartment rentals more expensive (and lower quality).

Overpaid municipal workers must be supported with higher taxes and/or higher fees.

[1] http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/Families-exodus-leaves...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rent Affordability Gap in San Francisco by huxley on Sunday September 29, 2013 @12:28PM (#6465587)
The article you cite doesn't say anything about overpaid municipal workers or rent control.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rent Affordability Gap in San Francisco by rayiner on Sunday September 29, 2013 @01:37PM (#6465859)
Rent controls decrease supply. They help the few (mostly old) people who get in early on them, but raise prices for everyone else. Highly paid municipal workers require high taxes to support their salaries and pensions. Housing prices and taxes are key reasons people cite for moving out of the cities into the suburbs.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rent Affordability Gap in San Francisco by dionidium on Sunday September 29, 2013 @01:52PM (#6465921)
Housing prices and taxes are key reasons people cite for moving out of the cities into the suburbs.

Regarding housing prices: this may be true in first-rate cities like San Francisco or New York, but here in St. Louis (and in dozens of similar cities in the U.S.) housing is usually cheaper in the city's core. People left for the suburbs to get more space, because they had automobiles, because the housing stock in the suburbs is much newer, because blacks were moving in, and because of crime levels (some real, some perceived).

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rent Affordability Gap in San Francisco by rayiner on Sunday September 29, 2013 @02:12PM (#6465987)
Desegregation and crime were major reasons, sure, but housing prices and taxes didn't help the situation. And today, even though there is a big trend of young people moving back into cities, questions remain about whether they'll stay while taxes ratchet up to support underfunded pensions, etc.

Also, rent controls depress the quality of housing stock.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rent Affordability Gap in San Francisco by bostonscott on Sunday September 29, 2013 @11:36AM (#6465427)
"destroying American cities"

Is she arguing SF is or will soon be "destroyed"?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rent Affordability Gap in San Francisco by pessimizer on Sunday September 29, 2013 @11:38AM (#6465432)
No, rayiner is.
[ Parent | on HN ]