Leo Laporte loses it with Mike Arrington on the Gillmor Gang

Re:Leo Laporte loses it with Mike Arrington on the Gillmor Gang by jibiki on Saturday June 06, 2009 @08:48PM (#645360)

> Where's the disconnect?

Nobody can downvote articles.

Also, TC's journalism isn't usually just MA stirring up drama. The average TC article on HN simply profiles a new startup, or service, or acquisition.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Leo Laporte loses it with Mike Arrington on the Gillmor Gang by jganetsk on Sunday June 07, 2009 @12:39PM (#646030)

Now, the average TC article is about Twitter.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Leo Laporte loses it with Mike Arrington on the Gillmor Gang by htsh on Saturday June 06, 2009 @09:32PM (#645387)

just wondering - if nobody can downvote, how is it than some trollish stories end up at 0 or negative numbers?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Leo Laporte loses it with Mike Arrington on the Gillmor Gang by oomkiller on Saturday June 06, 2009 @09:37PM (#645390)

Never seen a negative story, but I have seen stories removed, which is done by an admin (i think) after it gets a few 'flags'

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Leo Laporte loses it with Mike Arrington on the Gillmor Gang by htsh on Saturday June 06, 2009 @10:22PM (#645438)

you're right, i've never seen a story but i've seen comments that are at 0 or negative. I assume that there are a bunch of moderators that can downvote?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Leo Laporte loses it with Mike Arrington on the Gillmor Gang by jibiki on Saturday June 06, 2009 @10:30PM (#645445)

Anyone with 101 or more karma can downvote comments.

[ Parent | on HN ]