Re:Revealed: Qatar's World Cup 'slaves'
by wnevets on Wednesday September 25, 2013 @02:27PM
(#6446352)
Sounds like modern day slavery to me
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Revealed: Qatar's World Cup 'slaves'
by jlgreco on Wednesday September 25, 2013 @02:30PM
(#6446373)
That is exactly what it is. The author and/or editor should have had a spine and made the headline: "Revealed: Qatar's World Cup slaves"
Re:Revealed: Qatar's World Cup 'slaves'
by nether on Wednesday September 25, 2013 @03:40PM
(#6446818)
You're ascribing American notions of journalism to a British paper. They are not scare quotes.
Yes, our libel laws are much stronger. And scarier in scope.
Re:Revealed: Qatar's World Cup 'slaves'
by superluminary on Wednesday September 25, 2013 @04:33PM
(#6447116)
In England that would read like hack journalism. It would cheapen the paper and make people doubt the story.
Re:Revealed: Qatar's World Cup 'slaves'
by jlgreco on Wednesday September 25, 2013 @04:48PM
(#6447194)
I now understand that they are not using scare quotes in this case (which is what my mistaken objection was to), but I don't think that would be hack journalism. They still don't quote like that for the phrase "sex slave" for instance.
Re:Revealed: Qatar's World Cup 'slaves'
by sudomal on Wednesday September 25, 2013 @04:14PM
(#6447012)
Better to let the reader make up their own opinion rather than to push your own.
'Slave' is a loaded term, it's like calling someone a 'terrorist' or a 'murderer'.
Re:Revealed: Qatar's World Cup 'slaves'
by banachtarski on Wednesday September 25, 2013 @04:45PM
(#6447176)
I worked in Qatar for several months. It is modern day slavery precisely.