News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on /story/6441644.

Re: by thomc on Tuesday September 24, 2013 @08:47PM (#6441922)
I'm not sure why, but the blog post seems to be passing off Dan Rosenberg's comment on the stack-based buffer overflow as though it was written by the blog author. The original post with credits: https://plus.google.com/110348415484169880343/posts/5ofgPNrS...
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by mumphster on Tuesday September 24, 2013 @08:57PM (#6441982)
He actually thanks the author and the rest of the post is verbatim of what is on that g+ post for some reason. That blog engine or whatever makes it look like the normal text of the post.

I do agree though, the presentation does make it look like hes taking credit for it, especially with the "Follow me on twitter" on the bottom. Kinda blogspammy.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re: by malign on Tuesday September 24, 2013 @08:58PM (#6441988)
Looks like he gave credit where credit was due.
[ Parent | on HN ]