Re:Vint Cerf: 'Privacy's an accident of the urban revolution'
by stephenr on Tuesday September 24, 2013 @01:16PM
(#6439254)
> certain new technologies
of which his employer makes/uses/promotes several.
just because someone did "good things" previously doesn't mean their actions and/or comments are all inherently "good".
Two: the headline is highly paraphrased, which I guess you know since you've read the whole thing. Also sociologically speaking even that warped baiting headline is technically correct.
So, again since you actually read the piece, you'd agree that the point he was making is that "privacy", important as it is, is a subjective and evolving concept thus society shouldn't use it to dismiss or outright ban certain new technologies.