Re:Invest in Startups
by coryfklein on Monday September 23, 2013 @02:01PM
(#6432874)
What is the reasoning behind limiting non-accredited investing anyway? Why is it a crime for me to give somebody else money if I am happy with the terms of the contract?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I think it's the same as the reasoning behind limiting any form of gambling -- there is a savviness imbalance between the gamblers and the house, and the potential cost to society of gamblers losing more than they can afford is thought to outweigh the benefit of people being completely free to make their own decisions with their own money.
Thankfully, this will be legal in mid-2014, when the SEC finishes implementing the JOBS Act.
In the 1930's - pre-Internet - people were more easily scammed by traveling salesmen selling oil wells and such.
We have a lot more information at our fingertips these days.
We have a lot more information at our fingertips these days, and 25% of the country is convinced that Barack Obama was born in Kenya.
I feel like we're just running the cycle on this one, someone should put up a countdown to the next Enron and these investments being made illegal again.
Re:Invest in Startups
by tlrobinson on Monday September 23, 2013 @11:26PM
(#6435759)
To be fair, people are still easily scammed on the Internet. See: Bitcoin stock exchanges.