News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Microsoft’s Hardware, Round 2: Surface 2 and Surface Pro 2 by RyJones on Monday September 23, 2013 @01:42PM (#6432709)
Because a small fraction of people buy it, and a smaller fraction of purchasers turn it on.

I've bought (and given away) four iPads with Verizon LTE. Exactly 0 people activated it.

This is old data, but in line with newer data I've seen WRT iPad activation rates: http://tabletquest.com/2011/02/disappointing-apple-ipad-3g-a...

Re:Microsoft’s Hardware, Round 2: Surface 2 and Surface Pro 2 by luscious on Monday September 23, 2013 @02:44PM (#6433269)
There isn't a great story for dropping one more device - the phone. And that story is quite unlikely since you wouldn't want to carry your tablet with you on a night out, etc. I could see myself using this and dropping my phone if I never did things like out of band experiences. I'd eventually have enough situations per year where I wanted my phone, not my tablet, that I'd end up with a phone - but maybe I'd live with a 3-5 year old phone for that...

The wife would not like to see the tablet around 100% of the time since, with LTE, it'd be a physical extension more than PC's and the phone are now.

Re:Microsoft’s Hardware, Round 2: Surface 2 and Surface Pro 2 by davidacoder on Monday September 23, 2013 @02:25PM (#6433092)
Well, sure, for a consumer device that I use on my couch in the evenings, I certainly don't need LTE. But the Pro seems pretty geared towards business, right? For business travelers this makes a huge, huge difference, though. And it seems to me that the high end Pro version is probably exclusively targeted at business users, at its price.
Re:Microsoft’s Hardware, Round 2: Surface 2 and Surface Pro 2 by RyJones on Wednesday September 25, 2013 @06:50PM (#6447841)
I would have bought LTE with my surface pro, had it been offered. My iPad's LTE is so flaky I don't trust it.