News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Datomic: Can Simple be also Fast?.

Re:Datomic: Can Simple be also Fast? by wheaties on Sunday September 22, 2013 @10:54AM (#6426793)
Isn't HornetQ the queue that allows one "ack" to speak for the past five messages. That is, if I were to lose one of the past five messages I sent, I would never know because the system would consider the message delivered. To me, that is a severe flaw and could open you up to a nightmare of debugging if used improperly. Either go full acks or go ack-less.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Datomic: Can Simple be also Fast? by leif on Sunday September 22, 2013 @12:33PM (#6427044)
Sounds like mongodb's batched write semantics.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Datomic: Can Simple be also Fast? by twic on Monday September 23, 2013 @02:06PM (#6432931)
I haven't heard of any such problem with HornetQ. If this was unavoidable behaviour, then it would be impossible to correctly implement the JMS specification, i think. I fear you may be mistaken, although i would be very interested to hear more about this if not.
[ Parent | on HN ]