News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Britain's GCHQ hacked Belgium's telco Belgacom by rwmj on Friday September 20, 2013 @08:27AM (#6417238)
Interestingly, this has not been reported in the UK.
Re:Britain's GCHQ hacked Belgium's telco Belgacom by eliot_sykes on Friday September 20, 2013 @09:05AM (#6417404)
D-Notices limit what the news organisations can report on here in the UK.

Here's some correspondence with the BBC that shows what's going on. The BBC acknowledge they have been asked to talk to the government before reporting on anything to do with the recent security revelations: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/reporting_on_gchqs_te...

Re:Britain's GCHQ hacked Belgium's telco Belgacom by da_n on Friday September 20, 2013 @08:48AM (#6417328)
There is a gag order on the media against any reporting of GCHQ. Ministry of Truth is in full effect in the UK right now.
Re:Britain's GCHQ hacked Belgium's telco Belgacom by tombrossman on Friday September 20, 2013 @09:08AM (#6417418)
Not disputing that there is some 'voluntary' suppression of facts by the media but a quick search of BBC news shows 5 stories in the last 10 days. http://www.bbc.co.uk/search/news/?q=GCHQ
Re:Britain's GCHQ hacked Belgium's telco Belgacom by eliot_sykes on Friday September 20, 2013 @09:16AM (#6417473)
In the UK, we aren't having any real public debate about the security services, largely because the homegrown news organisations aren't giving the issues the attention they deserve. I don't know what would happen to them if they took a stand against a D-Notice.

(BTW, the 2nd result on that BBC news search is more like a job ad for GCHQ)

(Edited to remove my erroneous claim that D-notices aren't voluntary, turns out they are, though hardly any media orgs. go against them)

Re:Britain's GCHQ hacked Belgium's telco Belgacom by da_n on Friday September 20, 2013 @01:21PM (#6419104)