News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Case Against Cucumber by joe_the_user on Thursday September 19, 2013 @03:25PM (#6413662)
In theory, this is a valuable thing, a bridge between the divergent worlds of developers and managers. In practice, however, I’ve never seen Cucumber used this way. Non-technical people don’t read code, no matter how easy it is to read.

I don't know Cucumber at all but I find it fascinating how this software seems join a long list of hopeful but discarded "human readable coding" systems - both Cobol and SQL were touted back in the day as ways non-programmers could write code and consensus seems to be that the human-readable part just made things more difficult on the balance.

Re:A Case Against Cucumber by stdbrouw on Friday September 20, 2013 @08:30AM (#6417255)
There are many, many people with limited programming skills who routinely do business analysis with SQL, and a whole suite of tools from e.g. Oracle to cater to exactly that audience. So while it's not really "human readable", in a sense it has achieved its goal of letting not-so-technical people do things that used to be reserved to computer scientists.
Re:A Case Against Cucumber by reinhardt on Thursday September 19, 2013 @05:08PM (#6414324)
SQL is nowhere near to being discarded; quite the contrary, for ex. Hive bringing it into the Hadoop ecosystem.