Re:Elon Musk's Hyperloop is viable, says maker of simulation...
by icambron on Thursday September 19, 2013 @01:18AM
(#6409983)
> In what way are Musk's criticisms of the CA HSR plan FUD?
No one is saying they were. The parent and grandparent are saying the Hyperloop announcement is FUD.
> if nothing else it should give people serious pause about the existing plan, and hopefully force a revision of it.
So, at the very least, the uncertainty and doubt parts of FUD?
Edit: s/fear/doubt
Even if Musk's Hyperloop proposal remains only a proposal, if nothing else it should give people serious pause about the existing plan, and hopefully force a revision of it. The route through Palmdale is utterly pointless, tacks on a dozen minutes to a trip that's already too long, and exists largely to satisfy NIMBYs and give fat checks to a bunch of property speculators. That particular element of the HSR plan reeks of cowardice, corruption and graft. Consider this as an alternative:
http://www.cahsrblog.com/2013/06/the-truth-about-tejon/
Musk's opposition to the existing plan is well reasoned and rational. Calling it FUD is itself a sort of FUD.