News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:FBI Admits It Controlled Tor Servers Behind Mass Malware ... by jacquesm on Saturday September 14, 2013 @05:39AM (#6385137)
Both my banks do (European banks, specifically Rabo and ABN/AMRO).

These are still not immune to phishing attacks but it's a lot better than TAN codes or some other 'dumb' authentication scheme.

Typically these systems work in conjunction with pin-and-chip card, a small piece of hardware that generates the codes and a challenge / response system built into the website you use for the authorization.

Separate challenges exist for logging in (read access) and transferring money.

Re:FBI Admits It Controlled Tor Servers Behind Mass Malware ... by just_testing on Saturday September 14, 2013 @07:27PM (#6387487)
Those are common in Brazilian banks as well. At least four of the six biggest (I don't remember about the last two) do two-factor authentication.

Another cool thing I've seen in Banco do Brasil was the need to authorize the computer you're going to use in a ATM or in a 1-800. If I recall correctly, they do that with a Java applet.

Recently they also launched a common-malware-search-and-destroy application of MANDATORY use in Windows computers (my mom uses, she asked me. And yes, the digital certificates were all valid).

Re:FBI Admits It Controlled Tor Servers Behind Mass Malware ... by eru on Saturday September 14, 2013 @02:04PM (#6386465)
What's wrong with TANs?