Re:Google Might Have Walked Into A Nestle Boycott Problem Wi...
by vdaniuk on Friday September 13, 2013 @05:40AM
(#6379422)
Google literally didn't do anything evil by releasing an update to Android with the codename same as a popular chocolate product, which is owned by a company with unethical practices. This is not evil unless you specifically redefine a meaning of the word.
Oxford dictionary
evil noun
profound immorality and wickedness, especially when regarded as a supernatural force: his struggle against the forces of evil
a manifestation of this, especially in people’s actions: the evil that took place last Thursday
something which is harmful or undesirable: sexism, racism, and all other unpleasant social evils
Re:Google Might Have Walked Into A Nestle Boycott Problem Wi...
by icebraining on Friday September 13, 2013 @06:07AM
(#6379478)
Playing Devil's advocate, one could make an argument that by promoting Nestle, they are accomplices in their harmful (and often illegal) activities.
Personally I don't think Google is any more guilty than any other company where Nestle has advertised on, including TV channels or newspapers, but I do think the world would be a better place if companies with Nestle's track record were to be ostracized by both consumers and other companies.
Re:Google Might Have Walked Into A Nestle Boycott Problem Wi...
by vdaniuk on Friday September 13, 2013 @09:33AM
(#6380313)
Yeah, the world really would be a better place. But it is nash equilimbrium all over again and its absolutely pointless to shame one of the players(corporation or consumer). The only effectively viable path to making a world a better place is to change the rules of the game.
I wonder how many Google employees today would know the meaning of "Don't be evil".