News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Markdown is the Future of Writing by eksith on Friday September 13, 2013 @01:31AM (#6378833)
The key takeaway : "Markdown lets you think about what you’re writing instead of how it looks"... which is arguably a bit difficult when you're manipulating raw HTML and a bit... detached on WISIWYG.

Markdown allows sophisticated ideas to fall into text with a very simple syntax. I don't know of any other system that allows this except just plain text.

Edit: Hmm... looks like agreeing with the article isn't popular for some reason.

Re:Markdown is the Future of Writing by ghayes on Friday September 13, 2013 @02:08AM (#6378935)
The issue with Markdown is the syntax is pretty horrible. To create a link, it's [ title ] ( url ), which is incredibly unintuitive. I'm still never sure if italics are or * *. Heck, if I want a single newline, that's not possible. I am all for using a markup syntax; I just wish we had a better option than Markdown specifically.

Additionally, Medium is specifically, heavily concerned with "how it looks" as that is one of the main selling points of the blog software.

Re:Markdown is the Future of Writing by dchest on Friday September 13, 2013 @03:05AM (#6379088)
A single newline is possible, and it's the most horrible thing in Markdown:

   When you do want to insert a <br /> break tag using Markdown,
   you end a line with two or more spaces, then type return.
http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax#p
Re:Markdown is the Future of Writing by koralatov on Friday September 13, 2013 @03:26AM (#6379141)
Agreed. It's an appalling kludge, and I bet most of these ``distraction-free writing environments'' (vomit) don't highlight the extra trailing spaces in any way.

I have the following in my .vimrc which at least makes them visible:

  set listchars=tab:»\ ,eol:¬,trail:·
Of course, having them visible doesn't change the fact that they're an appalling kludge and I still tend to use <br /> instead.
Re:Markdown is the Future of Writing by computeloops on Friday September 13, 2013 @02:23AM (#6378980)
reStructuredText is another option. It is quite powerful, but the syntax is little complex compared to Markdown.

http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html

Re:Markdown is the Future of Writing by backprojection on Friday September 13, 2013 @02:44AM (#6379028)
Silly question: shouldn't be piss-simple to write with whatever syntax you like and parse it to markdown, with tools like Python?
Re:Markdown is the Future of Writing by lelandbatey on Friday September 13, 2013 @03:10AM (#6379103)
Indeed, I'd write it more formally as "Markdown lets you focus on the content and structure of your work, with no thought to it's appearance."

For me, this is huge. I take all my notes for all my classes (save classes that require odd symbols such as math) in markdown, because by it's nature it guides my notes into a very nicely structured format. Once I have my content and structure, I can build differently styled documents for all of my different use cases: viewing my notes on kindle, reading them on computer, or printing them.

Markdown's really powerful, and I love using it.

Re:Markdown is the Future of Writing by voyou on Friday September 13, 2013 @02:59AM (#6379071)
"I don't know of any other system that allows this except just plain text."

How about any WYSIWYG editor? The simplest syntax is no syntax.