Re:Government Announces Steps to Restore Confidence on Encry...
by throwaway_yy2Di on Wednesday September 11, 2013 @02:17AM
(#6365810)
"The whole spiel has made several rounds on HN, though [1]"
If you look at this discussions, HN commenters were very skeptical this was an NSA backdoor. The speculative possibility isn't news; the fact very much is.
Re:Government Announces Steps to Restore Confidence on Encry...
by ReidZB on Wednesday September 11, 2013 @09:20AM
(#6366946)
That's the thing, though: this article doesn't say that the NSA did generate the Dual_EC_DRBG constants with a backdoor in mind. It just says that internal memos suggest and appear to confirm that they did.
That is, the article isn't really anything new.
The whole spiel has made several rounds on HN, though [1], and Ars reported again on the matter about a week ago [2]. But I do acknowledge that doesn't necessarily mean much... not everyone has the time (or the inclination!) to follow such matters.
[1] https://www.hnsearch.com/search#request/all&q=dual_ec_drbg&s...
[2] http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/09/the-nsas-work-to-mak...