That's what "zero knowledge" means: You don't have to trust your own infrastructure. Your mail server could be in Fort Meade. The user's data is still protected.
Perhaps they could be ordered to shut down. But that wouldn't result in your data being compromised.
I do think this is where our technologies have needed to head for at least the past ten years. But real progress occurs slowly, and most of the tech community's attention is captured by the VC-fueled marketing circus.
The direct point I am making is that privacy preserving tools necessarily run on a user's computer completely under their control and need to be open source to be trustable. Which means they're incompatible with business unless you want to fall back on support and custom development. So they won't be promoted or purposely developed by established companies such as Yahoo, or VC-funded startups looking for a big exit.
If you are first to market with strong encryption, web-of-trust, zero-knowledge, open-client email, you take all your competitors' customers who care about privacy.
Then you can tell me how many intrusions that thwarted.