News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Message threading (1997-2002) by songgao on Sunday September 08, 2013 @09:20PM (#6351335)
My personal experience is that, I like how mutt looks and the fact that I'm able to deal with emails in CLI. The reason I'm not using it as my main email client (yet) is that I can't remember all shortcuts and I don't know enough what exactly each keystroke does to my emails and email server. These can all be fixed by reading docs and more practice though. I guess it's the same thing as vim. Once you are used to it, it becomes the favorite.
Re:Message threading (1997-2002) by jvehent on Sunday September 08, 2013 @09:50PM (#6351405)
And like vim, you will probably never use, nor need, all the shortcuts available. I use about a dozen keys in mutt, some of which are custom binding I use to send messages to separate maildir in one keystroke.

All my emails get into my Inbox (except for bugzilla stuff). I go through my Inbox several times a day, and as I read messages, I press 'o', 'n', 'e', or 'a' to send the message in one of the four folders I mostly use. For the rest, I sort it manually using the 's' key. This way, my Inbox is always empty. Or if it's not, I know it's a message I need to get back to later on. There's usually no more than a handful of those.

Granted, you can do that with any mail client. But mutt is particularly well suited for the job.