Re:Your Phone Is Deadlier Than Pacific Sushi
by worldsayshi on Friday September 06, 2013 @01:35AM
(#6338872)
Ah. I'd say don't that this fud could be allowed to run its course for a little while. The tuna could use some time to recover.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Your Phone Is Deadlier Than Pacific Sushi
by meatwad on Friday September 06, 2013 @02:43AM
(#6339037)
The headline was very misleading fud indeed... ironically after reading this I have the strange craving for fresh tuna, or even a guided tuna trip off the pacific coast. I'm convinced its delicious and safer than a banana. Was this some kind of tuna industry media reverse psychology?
Re:Your Phone Is Deadlier Than Pacific Sushi
by gojomo on Friday September 06, 2013 @01:48AM
(#6338889)
Now there's an interesting thought. Environmental-disaster/health-scare hoaxes, to give certain targeted wild ecosystems a chance to heal. If the environmental movement ever gets a covert operations agency, maybe that's what we'll see. (Or are already seeing?)
Re:Your Phone Is Deadlier Than Pacific Sushi
by Groxx on Friday September 06, 2013 @01:51AM
(#6338900)
It's not working very well, if that's the case.
Maybe a new strategy is in order? They could spread documents that reveal that tuna has been involved in all major internet trolling incidents between 2010 and 2013.
Re:Your Phone Is Deadlier Than Pacific Sushi
by reginaldjcooper on Friday September 06, 2013 @02:37AM
(#6339021)
They should go with "studies have shown that chemical X (found in tuna) can cause male genitalia to shrink by up to 17%". People don't care about dying 10 years sooner, but they do care about having bigger penises.
Re:Your Phone Is Deadlier Than Pacific Sushi
by Moto7451 on Friday September 06, 2013 @02:43AM
(#6339038)
Not sure about that either. When I was in middle school Mountain Dew was said to do exactly that. I think parents and teachers just wanted kids to stay away from sugary drinks. My friends kept drinking it anyways.