News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Radical Inclusion vs. Radical Self-Reliance at Burning Man by csallen on Thursday September 05, 2013 @10:23PM (#6338348)
I believe I understand your point, but I most whole-heartedly disagree. Rarely is it advisable to avoid acknowledging/discussing a problem merely because doing so is uncomfortable.

MLK Jr. wrote an amazing letter (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_from_Birmingham_Jail) that expressed a similar sentiment. In it, he asserted that overtly-racist whites were better for the civil rights movement than those who were against racism and yet remained silent because conflict made them too uncomfortable.

(Not that class divisions at Burning Man are as important as civil rights, by any means. But you get my point.)

Re:Radical Inclusion vs. Radical Self-Reliance at Burning Man by fixxer on Thursday September 05, 2013 @10:37PM (#6338390)
I don't get your point. How can I while still on the floor laughing at how anyone could compare a hippie revival with the civil rights movement?

If you started chanting hari krishna right now this wouldn't be any more strange.

Re:Radical Inclusion vs. Radical Self-Reliance at Burning Man by csallen on Thursday September 05, 2013 @10:50PM (#6338425)
Re:Radical Inclusion vs. Radical Self-Reliance at Burning Man by fixxer on Thursday September 05, 2013 @10:56PM (#6338437)
An analogy presumes a relationship between two concepts.

You might look up "straw man argument".

Re:Radical Inclusion vs. Radical Self-Reliance at Burning Man by csallen on Thursday September 05, 2013 @11:42PM (#6338554)
Are you claiming that my analogy didn't point out a relationship between the two subjects in dispute? Because it very clearly did.