News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Really Good Article on How Easy it Is to Crack Passwords by dasil003 on Thursday September 05, 2013 @09:28AM (#6333994)
Where are you guys getting this? All I read was this:

> Steube was able to crack "momof3g8kids" because he had "momof3g" in his 111 million dict and "8kids" in a smaller dict.

> "The combinator attack got it! It's cool," he said. Then referring to the oft-cited xkcd comic, he added: "This is an answer to the batteryhorsestaple thing."

It sounds to me like he's combining words randomly, not "exploiting common human behavior".

Re:A Really Good Article on How Easy it Is to Crack Passwords by barrkel on Thursday September 05, 2013 @11:55AM (#6334914)
He found a password by 2 words randomly from two dictionaries of different sizes, so he only had m * n combinations to choose from, and his n is a lot smaller than m.

Whereas the xkcd approach is more like m * m * m * m.

In other words, exponentiation > multiplication.

Re:A Really Good Article on How Easy it Is to Crack Passwords by belorn on Thursday September 05, 2013 @07:10PM (#6337731)
Correct. What I meant with "exploiting common human behavior", is that the dictionaries the attacker used is built from list of old passwords found in previous attacks. Those dictionary will be order of magnitude smaller than a dictionary of the English language, but attackers know that people tend to pick passwords (or in this case, compilation of passwords) that someone else has already thought of before. Its a simple observed behavior that people in general tend to think alike, and simply do not think randomly even if individually, it "feels" random.