News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re: by xSwag on Sunday September 01, 2013 @06:46AM (#6309788)
Could a moderator please put some sort of warning in the title? Those images make me sick and so angry it's unbelievable.
Re: by kevingadd on Sunday September 01, 2013 @06:51AM (#6309803)
A NSFW warning would be extremely appropriate, even if we are in the middle of a long weekend in the US.
Re: by dvanduzer on Sunday September 01, 2013 @06:49AM (#6309800)
I don't understand. Is the headline already not warning enough? Are you offended by the _existence_ of images?
Re: by octo_t on Sunday September 01, 2013 @06:56AM (#6309817)
Trigger warnings are important. A rape survivor may have braced themselves for a textual story on rape, but have been completely unprepared for the images.
Re: by Achshar on Sunday September 01, 2013 @07:24AM (#6309875)
Do we have trigger warnings for people who have been through other horrible things in life? That would be a lot of warnings on a lot of posts. Saying the post is NSFW should be enough.
Re: by dvanduzer on Sunday September 01, 2013 @07:30AM (#6309896)
Why would you argue against this reason for a warning in a discussion thread where the primary complaint is "but I'm at work" ?
Re: by Achshar on Sunday September 01, 2013 @07:33AM (#6309903)
I am not against an NSFW tag, of course.
Re: by kibibu on Sunday September 01, 2013 @07:32AM (#6309898)
Don't underestimate the strength of the response to such a trigger.
Re: by Achshar on Sunday September 01, 2013 @07:47AM (#6309972)
That's true for any survivor of any kind of horrible experience. Why single out rape?
Re: by riffraff on Sunday September 01, 2013 @07:10AM (#6309841)
the headline as it's now "Rape of Iraqi Women by US Forces as Weapon of War (asiantribune.com)" does not in any way suggest that pictures of said rape are present in the page.
Re: by dvanduzer on Sunday September 01, 2013 @07:15AM (#6309855)
As your sibling poster mentioned, and I hadn't quite realized, a "trigger warning" is a legitimate context for this complaint. The not-safe-for-work crowd has no truck here, regardless of what time or day it is.
Re: by adwf on Sunday September 01, 2013 @07:46AM (#6309964)
NSFW is generally used as a synonym for "potentially inappropriate". And yes, they do have truck here.

I clicked the article expecting some further developments or prosecution over Abu Ghraib, I wasn't expecting to see graphic rape images. A NSFW tag would have been very welcome.

Not what I wanted to see when having breakfast with my family and reading the news...

Re: by danieldk on Sunday September 01, 2013 @07:08AM (#6309836)
I was expecting an article about the subject, which would be safe work work.

Besides that reading about such a topic is bad enough.

(I didn't follow the link.)

Re: by costapopescu on Sunday September 01, 2013 @07:40AM (#6309934)
I remember similar article was posted on reddit a few weeks ago along with those images. There was byline which suggested that images were take from some p0rn movie.
Re: by Zarkonnen on Sunday September 01, 2013 @07:38AM (#6309924)
Agreed. This isn't about things being safe for work, this is about letting people not have panic attacks when they click through on an article.
Re: by jcromartie on Sunday September 01, 2013 @07:50AM (#6309986)
I don't think they are real. Another commenter said they were previously identified as being from a niche Hungarian porn movie.