News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Craig Zucker: What Happens When a Man Takes on the Feds by HarryHirsch on Friday August 30, 2013 @09:56PM (#6305356)
Proof by insistence? In a different time Upton Sinclair published The Jungle, and that book set the forces in motion that gave the country inspection of meat products and also the FDA. I do realize that there are problems with that public authority, nevermind that it is intentionally underfunded, but no public oversight of the food and drug supply would be even worse. We know that for a fact, because we have seen it.
Re:Craig Zucker: What Happens When a Man Takes on the Feds by redthrowaway on Friday August 30, 2013 @11:23PM (#6305629)
That's regulation ensuring products are safe when used as intended, not regulation ensuring products can't be used unsafely. It's a key difference. The government should ensure bottled water is free from E. coli. It shouldn't ensure you can't drown in it.
Re:Craig Zucker: What Happens When a Man Takes on the Feds by shrnky on Friday August 30, 2013 @10:19PM (#6305432)
- Their authority the problem. Increasingly authoritarian being the issue. - As they should be underfunded. Keeps their power in check.
Re:Craig Zucker: What Happens When a Man Takes on the Feds by derleth on Saturday August 31, 2013 @01:03AM (#6305846)
> As they should be underfunded. Keeps their power in check.

No, changing laws keeps their power in check. Underfunding them simply makes them less effective and more arbitrary.

Re:Craig Zucker: What Happens When a Man Takes on the Feds by sneak on Friday August 30, 2013 @11:11PM (#6305590)
This is not a food or a drug.