News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reversing Sinclair's amazing 1974 calculator hack - half ... by TheLoneWolfling on Friday August 30, 2013 @03:52PM (#6303824)
The one issue I've already had with RPN is that you require a separator between numbers anyways - in RPN it's too easy to parse "23 4 +" as "2 34 +", for example, especially if you're writing quickly.
Re:Reversing Sinclair's amazing 1974 calculator hack - half ... by anonymouz on Saturday August 31, 2013 @04:28AM (#6306212)
On the HP calculators the separator would usually be the enter key. I think the old ones displayed just the top entry of the stack, on the newer ones with bigger display you see the stack with each entry on one line.
Re:Reversing Sinclair's amazing 1974 calculator hack - half ... by orclev on Friday August 30, 2013 @07:00PM (#6304722)
Might have been better to demonstrate that using subtraction as addition is commutative and thus either one works fine in this case.
Re:Reversing Sinclair's amazing 1974 calculator hack - half ... by sokoloff on Friday August 30, 2013 @09:31PM (#6305269)
One is 27; the other is 36.
Re:Reversing Sinclair's amazing 1974 calculator hack - half ... by orclev on Wednesday September 04, 2013 @04:44PM (#6330341)
LOL, apparently I suck as a parser. I read them as just swaps of the numbers, I.E. 23 4 + vs. 4 23 +.