His fathers business invested some money in his corporation. Now, from the story it appears that they didn't expect much of a return on this investment, but I don't think they acted predatory in any way.
I don't see why there should be any reason for a "payback" here, that is not how investing works, and quite frankly sounds very selfish and biased to me. If his business had completely failed and he ended up broke, would he be looking for a legal loophole to repay that $20,000 investment back to the company? I would tend to doubt it.
His scenario is almost exactly the model/concept of VC investing... Money is invested in seed companies knowing that it is highly probable it will be lost, but the slim chance of a large payoff makes the risk worthwhile.
The only reason I can think of without blaming his investor dad is his dad wants to shelter his kid all the time and doesn't think of him fit to run independently or doesn't want him to take that risk at all.