Re:The Growth Hacker's Dilemma: Process vs. Tactics
by tlarkworthy on Tuesday August 27, 2013 @02:43PM
(#6285316)
The smartest don't share their tactics, why would you give away competitive advantage?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Growth Hacker's Dilemma: Process vs. Tactics
by bronsontaylor on Tuesday August 27, 2013 @03:00PM
(#6285414)
The smartest know that dialog, discussion, and cooperation, can bring about a sum of possibilities that will easily dwarf any small-minded collection of tactics. By taking part, your part is enlarged.
Re:The Growth Hacker's Dilemma: Process vs. Tactics
by AznHisoka on Tuesday August 27, 2013 @05:04PM
(#6286271)
Sounds good on paper, possibly disastrous in practice.
Re:The Growth Hacker's Dilemma: Process vs. Tactics
by tlarkworthy on Tuesday August 27, 2013 @04:19PM
(#6286003)
in the scientific community results are top secret until published. Scientists are smart people working for the greater good, but they are fiercely competitive and don't risk giving their immediate peers any advantage.
Re:The Growth Hacker's Dilemma: Process vs. Tactics
by dshah on Tuesday August 27, 2013 @03:23PM
(#6285592)
The smartest share what they know all the time -- that's part of what makes them smart.
Re:The Growth Hacker's Dilemma: Process vs. Tactics
by cynusx on Tuesday August 27, 2013 @04:45PM
(#6286159)
marketing is different, marketing channels only remain good for a relatively short time period and sharing the knowledge around only hastens its demise. (oops, with marketing I mean growth hacking obviously)