News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US behavioural research studies skew positive by smtddr on Tuesday August 27, 2013 @01:58PM (#6285040)
Okay, fair enough. let me clarify:

- Those points I used are real arguments being made today. I don't have exact quotes/links, but they do exist. There are people who believe those 3 items are perfectly correct. I admit item#3 is a bit of an exaggeration, but there is an alleged issue of over-diagnosis of ADD. I'm not saying they're wrong, but just saying to keep in mind that there is a lot of money that would be lost if those 3 things were to be discovered false.

- I called out the USA because this article is about the USA. Also I noted in italics that I wasn't saying it was only USA.

- Indeed, I don't have any alternative. Though I did mention I like the idea of multiple countries doing the study to see if everyone reaches the same conclusion. I'm just saying there is something to be said for a bit of skepticism. We know how long it took for science to decide tobacco was bad for you. It wasn't like they didn't know before, it just took a long time to push past the greed & corruption that kept the data hidden. Just saying to always keep a critical mind with these things. Afterall, this article here is calling out exactly what I'm claiming.

EDIT: And I see my original comment has been upvoted out of the graveyard during my commute to work, so I guess there are people who agree with what I'm trying to say.

Re:US behavioural research studies skew positive by tensor on Tuesday August 27, 2013 @03:14PM (#6285512)
I am skeptical, which is why I don't put much value in your comment. Want to convince me that corn oil is bad or that cell phones cause cancer?

Cite proper studies on these things, and don't cherry pick results you like, give me a fair sampling of all research. If the data supports your claim, I'll believe it.