News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nimrod: C + Macros + GC by wmobit on Sunday August 25, 2013 @04:11PM (#6273489)
Dear everyone, please stop using C as a compile target. Thanks.
Re:Nimrod: C + Macros + GC by yoklov on Sunday August 25, 2013 @05:30PM (#6273803)
Err, why? It's fairly easy, and you get so much for free: portability, compiler optimizations, easy use of C libraries, easy interfacing with other languages...
Re:Nimrod: C + Macros + GC by codygman on Sunday August 25, 2013 @05:24PM (#6273792)
why?
Re:Nimrod: C + Macros + GC by copx on Sunday August 25, 2013 @06:12PM (#6273956)
One good argument I can think of would be compile time. C compiles slowly compared to almost every other language not C++. And of course you get the C compile time on top of the compile to C time, so I expect the Nimrod compile chain to be quite slow.

Doesn't mean that I am generally opposed to compiling to C, it's often a good trade-off.

Re:Nimrod: C + Macros + GC by winter_blue on Monday August 26, 2013 @04:00AM (#6275741)
A good solution to this is to go with a language like C-- (if you are too scared of LLVM).