Re:Nimrod: C + Macros + GC
by wmobit on Sunday August 25, 2013 @04:11PM
(#6273489)
Dear everyone, please stop using C as a compile target. Thanks.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Err, why? It's fairly easy, and you get so much for free: portability, compiler optimizations, easy use of C libraries, easy interfacing with other languages...
why?
One good argument I can think of would be compile time. C compiles slowly compared to almost every other language not C++. And of course you get the C compile time on top of the compile to C time, so I expect the Nimrod compile chain to be quite slow.
Doesn't mean that I am generally opposed to compiling to C, it's often a good trade-off.
Re:Nimrod: C + Macros + GC
by winter_blue on Monday August 26, 2013 @04:00AM
(#6275741)
A good solution to this is to go with a language like C-- (if you are too scared of LLVM).