Re:Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to retire within 12 months
by corresation on Saturday August 24, 2013 @11:16AM
(#6268850)
So....no benchmarks then. Convincing.
Re:Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to retire within 12 months
by raverbashing on Saturday August 24, 2013 @12:57PM
(#6269112)
At this point, it's you who's looking like an idiot, unless you really never used a computer with an OEM install of Windows.
I suggest you smash a finger with a hammer, when I did that it hurt but of course it's only anecdotal evidence
Re:Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to retire within 12 months
by corresation on Saturday August 24, 2013 @03:04PM
(#6269457)
Would you like to see my Tiger Deterrence Rock?
I have used countless installs of Windows, through MSDN, retail, Technet, and through vendors like Dell. I happen to avoid being a suggestible simpleton so I don't simply adopt the sophistry that is so common. Sorry if this offends you into hilarious insults.
Re:Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer to retire within 12 months
by raverbashing on Sunday August 25, 2013 @01:37AM
(#6271039)
No, what I'm saying is that if you claim "consumes exactly 0% of processor or I/O time,", (I repeat: exactly 0%) you don't know how computers work.
It's not a matter of benchmark, it's about computing 101.
100% wrong
1 - Startup time is affected by all the bloat
2 - Trial for slow/crappy AV, affects IO and CPU usage (more than other anti-virus)
3 - OEM "tools" that make it "easier" to use the computer, consuming a non trivial amount of CPU to check for updates, show several tray icons because of course you need a special utility to switch from builtin screen to external monitor even though the builtin one works better and by the way do you want to sign up to our special partner offers?