News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla is unable to sell its vehicles directly to the publ... by throwaway_yy2Di on Friday August 23, 2013 @06:26PM (#6266571)
I'm not arguing that US is universally free-market today, rather that it was less free-market 50 years ago.
Re:Tesla is unable to sell its vehicles directly to the publ... by rtpg on Saturday August 24, 2013 @10:34AM (#6268753)
I'm really tired of people trying to set an equivalence between free markets and lack of regulation. I don't know if that's exactly what you're trying to do but:

A free market is a very specific definition, there are things like atomicity of actors and whatnot. Loads of regulations can help meet that, for example:

-Governments handing out tax credits to new companies helps free markets

-Governments setting in anti-trust laws helps free markets

-Governments setting disclosure regulations helps free markets

Some regulations harm free markets (namely things like entry controls), but others protect it. We need to learn to make the distinction

Re:Tesla is unable to sell its vehicles directly to the publ... by jtoeman on Friday August 23, 2013 @08:05PM (#6266944)
i don't really agree. other than some deregulation (power, cable, etc), for the most part i'd say the government today is more intertwined with lobbyists/big corporations' interests at heart than they used to be...
Re:Tesla is unable to sell its vehicles directly to the publ... by hearty778 on Friday August 23, 2013 @08:56PM (#6267098)
Car franchise laws and taxi medallions didn't exist in the 70s?