Plus, I think networking is a skill, not a service.
And think about the cost- not just the equity, but the strings. It would be cheaper to pay a highly networked individual a fee for making introductions than getting VC funding.
I understand the perspective of someone who has no entre into what seems like a closed community. But having had to learn the skill of networking (and still not being great at it) I've found that anyone who you should partner with, sell to, or do business with, is open to at least hearing enough to understand what your value is. Once I realized this, I started talking to CEOs of companies that I would meet at various places - conferences, on planes, cold calling, etc. A few have not understood, some were a bit put off, but this is the reaction maybe %5 of the time. Everyone else has at least thought about what I've said, and even when they've said "no", a good number of times they've given me a name of someone I should be talking to instead.
I think by itself, this isn't a good reason to pursue VC funding. Advice and introductions are much less expensive elsewhere.
Do you really think a bootstrapping company could pay someone like PG what his time is worth? Letting him invest is a way of paying him, but it's even better because he doesn't collect unless you'r successful.
I'm not convinced being funded is necessary either, just that you have to weigh the advantages and disadvantages, and do the best with what you have.
My purpose is to point out the disadvantages, because the assumption seems to be that its always a good thing to get VC funds.