Re:Why does NASA use gold foil on equipment and gold-coated ...
by bradleyjg on Friday August 23, 2013 @12:12AM
(#6261668)
Gold has a large cross section, which basically means it presents a big target (amusingly such measurents are made in units of 'barns'). It's also stable, so you don't have to worry about natural decay events polluting your data.
Which properties in particular make it a good target?
Edit: more details from wikipedia[2] suggest starting from either mercury or platinum, although it's all a bit fiddly and isotope-specific. That page has some other interesting facts as well - I'd never really thought of element synthesis as economically practical (and with capital equipment costs, probably still isn't), but tungsten ($30/kg) -> rhenium ($6k/kg) -> osmium ($12k/kg) sounds like a nice business to be in if you can solve the practical problems.
When the balloons all run out, we might want to start making our own helium as well, which has the bonus of being really quite easy to do.
[1] http://chemistry.about.com/cs/generalchemistry/a/aa050601a.h...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthesis_of_precious_metals#G...