Re:Judge sentences Bradley Manning to 35 years
by sp332 on Thursday August 22, 2013 @06:58AM
(#6256342)
Calling 35 years "a lifetime" is exaggerating. Calling 35 years less than half a lifetime is accurate, not minimizing. "Half his remaining lifetime" is probably true, and that's also a valid way to look at it. But it doesn't really contradict what I said, because what I said is true. ("Possibly all of his remaining lifetime" is incredibly cynical, but technically true.)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Judge sentences Bradley Manning to 35 years
by clarky07 on Thursday August 22, 2013 @04:32PM
(#6259876)
First off, it's not that cynical. Plenty of people die before the age of 60. Male life expectancy is 76, so 35 years is 70% of expected remaining.
Also, the point I was originally making, is that for most people the quality of life between 25-60 is far higher than the quality of life from 60-95. Even if he does happen to live to 95 and it's "only half", most people are going to enjoy age 35 more than they are going to enjoy age 95.