Re:October 3, 2011 FISC Opinion Holding NSA Surveillance Unc...
by acqq on Wednesday August 21, 2013 @07:08PM
(#6253916)
It looks as we still don't know what exactly NSA did that was unconstitutional? Do we? If not, then what's the use of the disclosure as it is now?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:October 3, 2011 FISC Opinion Holding NSA Surveillance Unc...
by dangrossman on Wednesday August 21, 2013 @08:15PM
(#6254211)
It seems to be spelled out pretty clearly. The NSA was collecting internet messages through ISPs. These messages were supposed to be to, from, or about specific non-US targets, and the systems were supposed to have "minimization procedures" that would keep them from collecting other messages that were to/from/about US citizens. These procedures were found to be insufficient: the NSA collected tens of thousands of messages about US citizens without their consent, which the court found to be in violation of the fourth amendment.