GitHub's Hg-Git mercurial plugin

Re:GitHub's Hg-Git mercurial plugin by jokull on Monday May 25, 2009 @08:45AM (#625376)

This is how GitHub is going to win BitBucket. Maybe.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub's Hg-Git mercurial plugin by tumult on Monday May 25, 2009 @09:12AM (#625396)

Why does one have to defeat the other?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub's Hg-Git mercurial plugin by jokull on Monday May 25, 2009 @09:33AM (#625419)

Don't have to. My guess is that one is going to come out on top eventually.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub's Hg-Git mercurial plugin by greut on Monday May 25, 2009 @10:11AM (#625457)

Github seems to already be quite on top of Bitbucket. But both can live together nobody has to win or lose.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub's Hg-Git mercurial plugin by utx00 on Monday May 25, 2009 @07:25PM (#626026)

not necessarily. mutt/pine, emacs/vi, irrsi/chatX, python/ruby, .... in general a good thing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub's Hg-Git mercurial plugin by bayareaguy on Monday May 25, 2009 @02:48PM (#625737)

I still find BitBucket more useful since GitHub has no free plan that offers secure transfers.

[ Parent | on HN ]