News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Poll: Should we ban TechCrunch? by RiderOfGiraffes on Monday May 25, 2009 @07:04AM (#625280)
You can flag submissions, you can learn not to up-mod something before you actually read it, and you always just not click on the link!

There's a parallel here with language choice. Some languages let you shoot yourself in the foot, and others try desperately to protect you. Newbies might need and benefit from the protection, power users often get frustrated at being prevented from doing things.

My principle is: when there's a balance to achieve, don't forbid things.

Re:Poll: Should we ban TechCrunch? by lucumo on Monday May 25, 2009 @07:58AM (#625337)
> you can learn not to up-mod something before you actually read it

Others would need to learn that.

Re:Poll: Should we ban TechCrunch? by ErrantX on Monday May 25, 2009 @07:48AM (#625325)
flagging doesn't guarantee removal though does it? Flagging an article IS a way to note you think it is wrong, or malicious etc. BUT it is a private thing.. there is no indication how many others agreed etc.

Perhaps adding the # of flags might be an option (or some indication)