News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Exploring aisles 9-13 at my local supermarket by misiti3780 on Tuesday August 20, 2013 @12:32AM (#6241790)
That is fine, except for the fact that our heath care system is fundamentally fucked up and since we are moving toward a socialize system (which I am not trying to take a side on for the purposes of this comment), its going to cost you and I more money cause unhealthy people cost more (they get sicker more often, they have higher percentage of cancer, heart disease, etc - they are in the hospital a lot more).

I would be completely fine with all this stuff if insurance premiums were tied to weight/health - unfortunately for everyone who does exercise and stays in shape, they are not .... yet

Re:Exploring aisles 9-13 at my local supermarket by thatswrong0 on Tuesday August 20, 2013 @01:37AM (#6242007)
I've read that this isn't the case:

> Obesity is a major cause of morbidity and mortality and is associated with high medical expenditures. It has been suggested that obesity prevention could result in cost savings. The objective of this study was to estimate the annual and lifetime medical costs attributable to obesity, to compare those to similar costs attributable to smoking, and to discuss the implications for prevention. …. Although effective obesity prevention leads to a decrease in costs of obesity-related diseases, this decrease is offset by cost increases due to diseases unrelated to obesity in life-years gained. Obesity prevention may be an important and cost-effective way of improving public health, but it is not a cure for increasing health expenditures.

http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal...

Re:Exploring aisles 9-13 at my local supermarket by misiti3780 on Tuesday August 20, 2013 @09:49AM (#6243685)