News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Thing I Didn't Build by mourique on Monday August 19, 2013 @07:24AM (#6236567)
He proves a point and establishes a market by showing a google search query. I don't think this is valuable since we all know Google is building up your personal filter bubble. Therefore it's quite logic he gets suggestions for unprotected tweets, he's already investigating in that field. I don't get these results. But this might change now that i read his article and composed a comment on that matter.

Doing a google search is not a proof for anything anymore, because they are perfectly tailored for you. I wonder why people still do it.

Re:The Thing I Didn't Build by chatman on Monday August 19, 2013 @06:25AM (#6236427)
Twitter is not meant for protected accounts, rather for broadcast. Such users are far too less. Perhaps they are so dumb (to have protected tweets) that they deserved to be looked at, so that they can run away to their facebook where they must've originally come from.
Re:The Thing I Didn't Build by sluu99 on Monday August 19, 2013 @05:14PM (#6239900)
The same thing can be built for facebook, though.
Re:The Thing I Didn't Build by rvschuilenburg on Monday August 19, 2013 @06:25AM (#6236426)
Next: facebook 'private' photos
Re:The Thing I Didn't Build by lucaspiller on Monday August 19, 2013 @07:43AM (#6236644)
This would probably be legally easier. As long as you have the URL you can access them, so you are more of a directory than a provider of the data.

E.g. https://www.google.com/search?q=hphotos-ak-frc1

Re:The Thing I Didn't Build by alsothings on Monday August 19, 2013 @06:01AM (#6236382)
tl;dr - nothing on the web is private.