Re:The True Size of Africa - Misleading Maps
by crygin on Friday August 16, 2013 @05:09PM
(#6226747)
Essentially: conformal (angles are equal in different areas of the map -- this is the purpose of Mercator, for sailing), equal-area (regions of the same area are represented equally), contiguous (paths between regions do not leave the map, e.g. not a Goode homolosine, Dymaxion, etc). Pick two.
Re:The True Size of Africa - Misleading Maps
by baddox on Friday August 16, 2013 @05:29PM
(#6226842)
There is a lot of theory surrounding map projections. I only took an introductory GIS course in college, but it was clear that there is an incredible amount of work behind the scenes there.
Re:The True Size of Africa - Misleading Maps
by curiousdannii on Friday August 16, 2013 @07:02PM
(#6227308)
A spherical globe still counts as a projection of our non-spherical planet!
I've always preferred using a globe to get a perspective on the Earth and the various positions of continents and nations.
Re:The True Size of Africa - Misleading Maps
by BerislavLopac on Friday August 16, 2013 @05:05PM
(#6226732)
I wonder if there is some sort of theorem that describes which fidelities you can get out of a flat projection of the surface of a sphere. For example, a projection could have accurate area ratios or accurately reflect point to point distances but not both.