News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Encryption is less secure than we thought by tveita on Wednesday August 14, 2013 @10:57AM (#6211865)
> We establish that for source words originally constructed from an i.i.d. sequence of letters, as a function of word length it is exponentially easier to guess a word conditioned to be in the source’s typical set in comparison to the corresponding equipartition approximation.

Maybe I'm missing something, but this seems like a known and fairly trivial result.

I read that as basically saying that if you don't pick the letters in your passwords from an uniform distribution, they are easier to guess.

I don't see what that adds when people are already using Markov chains and dictionary attacks to brute force passwords, and I see no implication at all for secure keys chosen by good PRNGs.

I guess it could have some use in entropy estimation for PRNG state, but assuming uniform distribution of input seems like a naive mistake to make. Is there some application of this that I'm missing?

There are no comments on this comment yet.