Re:Perl 5.18.1. Yes, it's alive
by berntb on Tuesday August 13, 2013 @06:38AM
(#6204953)
>>OK, I admit it was a cheap shot. But I'm not the only one in the thread making it.
Thanks for making HN a bit more like bad Reddit today, with even more brainless language wars!
[Edit: Seriously, why even write if you have nothing to add but a "cheap shot" -- which is even written by others ("not the only one")!? Do you try to destroy this website?]
[Edit 2: I realize that the language wars idiots in some communities usually votes up comments like this about Perl, but take some damn responsibility for HN quality. Karma is not money.]
>>Can you explain how [the quote is] related to Perl?
If you're curious, please check the comment by Mithaldu, written before my first comment.
Thanks for making HN a bit more like bad Reddit today, with even more brainless language wars!
[Edit: Seriously, why even write if you have nothing to add but a "cheap shot" -- which is even written by others ("not the only one")!? Do you try to destroy this website?]
[Edit 2: I realize that the language wars idiots in some communities usually votes up comments like this about Perl, but take some damn responsibility for HN quality. Karma is not money.]
>>Can you explain how [the quote is] related to Perl?
If you're curious, please check the comment by Mithaldu, written before my first comment.